May 12, 2008

Are We About To Lose A National News Source? OPED NEWS

News website critically neccessary to freedom of press is at risk of discontinuing appropriate coverage of the UNFOLDING EXTRATERRESTRIAL CONTACT DISCLOSURE PROCESS. Your vote in their poll could prevent the loss of this highly respected publisher from among the growing ranks of REAL NEWS SOURCES.

This News Source carries one of the highest percentages of cutting edge news and commentary on the CONTACT DISCLOSURE subject. This affects everyone within and without this field of human exploration and experience. Your immediate action is needed on this!



From: Exopolitics <>Subject: [exopolitics_institute] New Poll on OpEdNews on extraterrestrial life and UFOsTo: "Exopolitics Institute" <>, "Exopolitics Institute News" <>,
Date: Sunday, May 11, 2008, 10:11 AM

Hello all, I invite you to vote in the following poll which debates whether progressive liberal websites like OpEdNews should incorporate articles on UFOs/extraterrestri als. Over the last several months, the editors at OpEdNews has allowed a number of groundbreaking articles on ET/UFO to appear. This has been very helpful in broadening the debate on ET life and bringing in fresh perspectives. There are those however that wish to ban or relegate such articles to a side page on OpEdNews, so it's important to participate and state your opinion. The poll is taking place here:
If you post a comment, please be sure to make it succinct and respectful.

Michael Salla, Ph.D.

Happy Mothers Day!
I cooked oatmeal with dried cranberries and fresh sliced pears, with slivered almonds on top and even boiled water for tea-- my major kitchen project for the year, beyond fried eggs and hamburgers. How about you? What did you do? Click here to add YOUR comment.

Poll: UFO and Exterrestrial Articles on OpEdNews?

I'd like to see a big response to this poll. Please click on the link above to vote.
The original vision for OpEdNews was to create an online site that covered the wide range of topics daily newspapers and weekly newsmagazines cover. Lately, we've had some of our members comment on our publishing articles on UFOs and extraterrestrials, suggesting they diminish our credibility. OTOH, some of the articles have brought thousands of readers to the site. What do you think? Please leave your comments on this. UFO stories are too woowoo and decrease our credibility. We should not publish them.

UFO stories are too woowoo and decrease our credibility, but they’re interesting and bring in readers who will read our political articles. We should put them on an inside page, without linking to them from the front page.

UFO stories are an interesting addition to the mix and fit with the OEN philosophy of being open to the widest range of ideas. Don’t change anything.

Since part of the mission of OEN is to reach new people, not just "members of the progressive choir," including non-political articles that draw new readers is a good thing,.

OEN should just focus on politics and progressive issues


Or click here: UFO and Exterrestrial Articles on OpEdNews?[/url]

Doing OpEdNews and Surviving.?
Last year, because I stopped running the conferences I ran for 15 years, so I could devote full time and attention to OpEdNews (usually 12-15 hours a day, seven days a week) my income dropped to the lowest it's been in decades. Decades! I took about $4000 in pay from OEN last year and this year, I really need to take at least $1500 to $2000 a month in pay from OEN. With a home, three kids (two in college and one heading back) and two dogs, believe me, I just barely get by every month. That pay does not include the costs for the website's private dedicated server and part time webmaster. Anyone who knows what I pay for them agrees the prices are very, very reasonable (some have offered to help with lower rates and what we're currently paying is lower.)

The bottom line is that I am now depending upon contributions to OpEdNews to pay my basic bills, to support my kids and there's not much left over. I have hope and faith that things will get better-- that we'll eventually land some foundation grants, that, as we grow, our contributions will rise. But for now, OEN and I are dependent upon you, our members to fund what we're doing. There are days when I seriously consider cutting way back and going for a salaried job. I don't want to do it. I love what I do here but I have to pay the bills. That means I need to raise money through contributions. That's where you come in. Last year, with an average of about 11,500 subscribers, we received about 1200 contributions. About 15-20% of them were from people who contributed monthly or at least more than once. Now, we have about 13,750 daily subscribers. It helps. We need to see 4-5 contributions averaging $38 each, every day to stay even. It's not a lot. It adds up to about 1680 contributions. I expect, by the end of the year, we'll at between 16,000 and 18,000 subscribers. So, the target, will represent about the same percentage of supporters as last year.

I know the economy is tough. I know you're going to want to support your candidates with contributions. But I also hope you'll see that support for what we do is a worthwhile investment, because if you don't think that, we're in trouble. The best thing you can do is to sign up for a monthly, authomatic contribution- - whether it's $5 or $100 or $700. We'll take all any or all of the above. If you're satisfied with Lou Dobbs, Chris Matthews, Wolf Blitzer and Joe Scarborough- -- forget about OpEdNews. But we're doing what we can to cover the news, to do the analysis and to provide the forum that you don't get ANYWHERE else. So please, make a contribution today, and, if you can, set up a monthly contribution. Click here to do it today.

Support OpEdNews by buying books.
One way you can support OEN is to purchase books and CDs I buy at auction for resale. I sell through my futurehealthinc Storefront on Some of the books are contemporary. Some are 100 or more years old. Check out the list. It ranges from science to history, politics, philosophy, arts, etc.

Volunteer for OpEdNews
OpEdNews is only as good as the people who are a part of it. We have a wonderful team of over 100 volunteers. We could use a lot more. Click on this link to read all the ways you can volunteer.


[b]rob kall [/b]

No comments:

Join My Web Ring

Business Affiliate ProgramsCouponPersonalsAdvertisingShopping

Critical Paradigm Developments



"Death of Free Internet is Imminent - Canada Will Become Test Case"
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:23:03 +0000

EXOPOLITICS NOTE: Exopolitics and ET/UFO-related broadcasters and publishers are now organizing as below, to to consider (1) an online banner ad awareness campaign, and (2) legislation in the U.S. Congress and the Canadian Parliament to require all ISP's to offer unimpeded and open access to the Internet. For more information please contact Open Internet Campaign at exopolitics@....NOTE: If Canadian and U.S. ISPs are successful in implementing this per-site fee access charges on any sites outside a "corporate core" of websites, the entire area civil society, investigative journalism,public protest, issue advocacy, free speech will be decimated, as we rely in independent websites which are not tied into corporate sponsorship that would be part of ISP service plans. U.S. and Canadian web-based journalists and communicators are now gathering to consider (1) an online banner ad awareness campaign, and (2) legislation in the U.S. Congress and the Canadian Parliament to require all ISP's to offer unimpeded and open access to the Internet. For more information please contact Open Internet Campaign at peace@.... Thank you.

Please distribute far & wide.

Thank you.

Death of Free Internet is ImminentCanada Will Become Test CaseBy Kevin Parkinson
21/07/08 "Global Research" --
- In the last 15 years or so, as a society we have had access to more information than ever before in modern history because of the Internet. There are approximately 1 billion Internet users in the world B and any one of these users can theoretically communica te in real time with any other on the planet. The Internet has been the greatest technological achievement of the 20th century by far, and has been recognized as such by the global community. The free transfer of information, uncensored, unlimited and untainted, still seems to be a dream when you think about it. Whatever field that is mentioned- education, commerce, government, news, entertainment, politics and countless other areas- have been radically affected by the introduction of the Internet. And mostly, it's good news, except when poor judgements are made and people are taken advantage of. Scrutiny and oversight are needed, especially where children are involved. However, when there are potential profits open to a corporation, the needs of society don't count. Take the recent case in Canada with the behemoths, Telus and Rogers rolling out a charge for text messaging without any warning to the public. It was an arrogant and risky move for the telecommunications giants because it backfired. People actually used Internet technology to deliver a loud and clear message to these companies and that was to scrap the extra charge. The people used the power of the Internet against the big boys and the little guys won. However, the issue of text messaging is just a tiny blip on the radar screens of Telus and another company, Bell Canada, the two largest Internet Service Providers (ISP'S) in Canada. Our country is being used as a test case to drastically change the delivery of Internet service forever. The change will be so radical that it has the potential to send us back to the horse and buggy days of information sharing and access.In the upcoming weeks watch for a report in Time Magazine that will attempt to smooth over the rough edges of a diabolical plot by Bell Canada and Telus, to begin charging per site fees on most Internet sites. The plan is to convert the Internet into a cable-like system, where customers sign up for specific web sites, and then pay to visit sites beyond a cutoff point. From my browsing (on the currently free Internet) I have discovered that the 'demise' of the free Internet is slated for 2010 in Canada, and two years later around the world. Canada is seen a good choice to implement such shameful and sinister changes, since Canadians are viewed as being laissez fair, politically uninformed and an easy target. The corporate marauders will iron out the wrinkles in Canada and then spring the new, castrated version of the Internet on the rest of the world, probably with little fanfare, except for some dire warnings about the 'evil' of the Internet (free) and the CEO's spouting about 'safety and security'. These buzzwords usually work pretty well.What will the Internet look like in Canada in 2010? I suspect that the ISP's will provide a "package" program as companies like Cogeco currently do. Customers will pay for a series of websites as they do now for their television stations. Television stations will be available on-line as part of these packages, which will make the networks happy since they have lost much of the younger market which are surfing and chatting on their computers in the evening. However, as is the case with cable television now, if you choose something that is not part of the package, you know what happens. You pay extra.And this is where the Internet (free) as we know it will suffer almost immediate, economic strangulation. Thousands and thousands of Internet sites will not be part of the package so users will have to pay extra to visit those sites! In just an hour or two it is possible to easily visit 20-30 sites or more while looking for information. Just imagine how high these costs will be. At present, the world condemns China because that country restricts certain websites. "They are undemocratic; they are removing people's freedom; they don't respect individual rights; they are censoring information," are some of the comments we hear. But what Bell Canada and Telus have planned for Canadians is much worse than that. They are planning the death of the Internet (free) as we know it, and I expect they'll be hardly a whimper from Canadians. It's all part of the corporate plan for a New World Order and virtually a masterstroke that will lead to the creation of billions and billions of dollars of corporate profit at the expense of the working and middle classes. There are so many other implications as a result of these changes, far too many to elaborate on here. Be aware that we will all lose our privacy because all websites will be tracked as part of the billing procedure, and we will be literally cut off from 90% of the information that we can access today. The little guys on the Net will fall likes flies; Bloggers and small website operators will die a quick death because people will not pay to go to their sites and read their pages. Ironically, the only medium that can save us is the one we are trying to save- the Internet (free).

This article will be posted on my Blog, and I encourage people and groups to learn more about this issue. Canadians can keep the Internet free just as they kept text messaging free. Don't wait for the federal politicians. They will do nothing to help us.I would welcome a letter to the editor of the Standard Freeholder from a spokesperson from Bell Canada or Telus telling me that I am absolutely wrong in what I have written, and that no such changes to the Internet are being planned, and that access to Internet sites will remain FREE in the years to come. In the meantime, I encourage all of you to write to the media, ask questions, phone the radio station, phone a friend, or think of something else to prevent what appears to me to be inevitable.Maintaining Internet (free) access is the only way we have a chance at combatting the global corporate takeover, the North American Union, and a long list of other deadly deeds that the elite in society have planned for us. Yesterday was too late in trying to protect our rights and freedoms. We must now redouble our efforts in order to give our children and grandchildren a fighting chance in the future.

Author's website:

Click on "comments" below to read or post comments Comments (75) Comment (0) _________________________________Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEdICIS-Institute for Cooperation in Space3339 West 41 AvenueVancouver, B.C. V6N3E5 CANADATEL: 604-733-8134FAX: 604-733-8135
Email: alw@...ICIS:



9/11 War Crimes Tribunal:





Scientists find Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA
by John Stokes

Artistic representation from Eyewitness testimony of Asket, the extraterrestrial human woman, reference:
A group of researchers working at the Human Genome Project indicate that they made an astonishing scientific discovery: They believe so-called 97% non-coding sequences in human DNA is no less than genetic code of extraterrestrial life forms.
The non-coding sequences are common to all living organisms on Earth, from moulds to fish to humans. In human DNA, they constitute larger part of the total genome, says Prof. Sam Chang, the group leader. Non-coding sequences, originally known as "junk DNA", were discovered years ago, and their function remained a mystery. The overwhelming majority of Human DNA is "Off-world" in origin. The apparent "extraterrestrial junk genes" merely "enjoy the ride" with hard working active genes, passed from generation to generation.
After comprehensive analysis with the assistance of other scientists, computer programmers, mathematicians, and other learned scholars, Professor Chang had wondered if the apparently "junk Human DNA" was created by some kind of "extraterrestrial programmer". The alien chunks within Human DNA, Professor Chang further observes, "have its own veins, arteries, and its own immune system that vigorously resists all our anti-cancer drugs."
Professor Chang further stipulates that "Our hypothesis is that a higher extraterrestrial life form was engaged in creating new life and planting it on various planets. Earth is just one of them. Perhaps, after programming, our creators grow us the same way we grow bacteria in Petri dishes. We can't know their motives - whether it was a scientific experiment, or a way of preparing new planets for colonization, or is it long time ongoing business of seedling life in the universe."
Professor Chang further indicates that "If we think about it in our human terms, the apparent "extraterrestrial programmers" were most probably working on "one big code" consisting of several projects, and the projects should have produced various life forms for various planets. They have been also trying various solutions. They wrote "the big code", executed it, did not like some function, changed them or added new one, executed again, made more improvements, tried again and again."
Professor Chang's team of researchers furthermore concludes that, "The apparent "extraterrestrial programmers" may have been ordered to cut all their idealistic plans for the future when they concentrated on the "Earth project" to meet the pressing deadline. Very likely in an apparent rush, the "extraterrestrial programmers" may have cut down drastically on big code and delivered basic program intended for Earth."
Professor Chang is only one of many scientists and other researchers who have discovered extraterrestrial origins to Humanity.
Human Genome Project Coordinators find absolute proof of Extraterrestrial contact with 'Earth humans' via DNA evidence.
Professor Chang and his research colleagues show that apparent "extraterrestrial programming" gaps in DNA sequencing precipitated by a hypothesized rush to create human life on Earth presented humankind with illogical growth of mass of cells we know as cancer."
Professor Chang further indicates that "What we see in our DNA is a program consisting of two versions, a big code and basic code." Mr. Chang then affirms that the "First fact is, the complete 'program' was positively not written on Earth; that is now a verified fact. The second fact is, that genes by themselves are not enough to explain evolution; there must be something more in 'the game'."
"Soon or later", Professor Chang says "we have to come to grips with the unbelievable notion that every life on Earth carries genetic code for his extraterrestrial cousin and that evolution is not what we think it is."

Participate in Disclosure: Contact Media About Events