The Damage of Silence

I've been off sifting through current events and wrangling with other disclosure enthusiasts over at Open Minds Forum for the last couple months. In the course of that time I came to note a problem faced by insiders when they make an effort to reach out to the public around them. The problem is that sixty odd years of veritable silence on the part of the keepers of the extraterrestrial contact paradigm has caused not only a great deal of cynicism within the ufology & exopolitics community but also an inability for the community members to accept a presentation of a very basic form of physical contact experience reported from whistleblowers or even partially sanctioned insiders.

Back in the early nineties the door was wide open to insiders of the contact control structure which manages the paradigm within the various bodies of government, military, and corporate contractors, a secluded world unto their own. When repeated attempts at cracking the lid of secrecy failed in the past, new theories for ETs apparent obscure behavior and the governments inability to connect with the public began to form.

Today those theories have taken shape in the terminology of 'phenomenology'. Enthusiasts of ufological & exopolitical analysis claim that disclosure is not in the hands of government officials, or even the PTB. Those powers are said to be ultimately incapable of achieving an honest disclosure especially one that brings their unique history along to the table for healing and understanding to occur. These new theories claim that only ET is capable of achieving disclosure. They claim that it will only be the ETs themselves who will determine the time, place, and nature of disclosure. It is also claimed that perhaps disclosure has not happened because ET does not want it. ET in the eyes of many human observers is satisfied with teasing humans and then leaving them hanging wanting desperately to understand and confused about why they keep their distance.

A part of this has to do with a jumbled stew pot of different ET types, a multitude of vaguely understood or hyper analyzed personal contact experiences along with similar items of better handling and more professional examination, all glommed together under one heading which depict Contact in confusing contexts and then are drawn out into etherial assumptions where questions raised by one species behavior are regularly attributed or grouped together with the behavior and experiences associated with others among the less experienced researchers in the field which comprise the largest and most vocal portion of the ufological and exopolitical community. Add to all this mix a wild array of existential possibilities and technology obviously so far advanced beyond our current capabilities as to seem magical or more interdimensional than associated with our mundane neck of the scientific/technological woods...it is no small wonder the task faced by Insiders and future world body Disclosers is ostensibly daunting, especially when they attempt to test and measure the waters. The ufology & exopolitical community is their own worst enemy making it so easy for governmental insiders to throw their hands in the air and run back to the comparative sanity and safety of the contact control structure from whence they originated.

Whereas the CCS, contact control structure, so labled for lack of a more official term has been largely silent for the last sixty years, the ufology & relatively new exopolitical communities have not. The sprawling U & E community have been very busy little beavers ravanously chewing their way through collecting, investigating, cataloging, and analyzing mountains of data, (documents, first-hand contact experiences from witnesses, ufo siting events, whistleblower testimonies, physical evidences, and collaborative study and analysis efforts) found within this paradigm in the absence of more official participation. In this absence of the CCS, these people stepped up to the plate and did what governments were failing to do publicly. Many members have thirty or more years of indepth experience and study in this material which would make both mainstream professional journalists and university scholars blush for being caught out of the loop with their pants around their ankles. A tremendous amount of praise must be heaped upon these individuals who took it upon themselves armed with little more than basic life skills and the scientific method, who jumped in with often times only personal funds to work with, and donated their lives to self education in the paradigm and dissemination to the public through websites, books, scholarly publications, blogs, wikizines, transparant associations, institutes, and conferences of what they learned.

The end results of the subject matter has been always open to lively debate. This is the consequence of openness and transparancy. Sometimes the liveliness gets so heated that fur flies and proverbial blood is spilled, but in the end the paradigm with all its questions and fascinating revelations remains and humanity flocks to it in their inherent curiosity where no age is too old or too young. In sixty years there has not occured any hard fast rules to apply to this subject other than bring proof for your claims and expect to be piled apon by both sharp and dull minds saturated with serious inquiry and personal biases which will pounce upon what you provide and analyze it seven ways to Sunday, and then drive it soundly into the ground of history with all the power their scrutiny can muster.

Cyrellys