Re: New (temporary) Rule - DS section
« Reply #36 Today at 11:15am »
Today at 9:50am, dan wrote:
That is very funny Dan, your humor is
coy, considering the prior Management of the Paradigm, also entrenched within
the 3 Letter Acronym Agencies among other places, is responsible for the Dumbing
Effect upon Surface Politicians. And a heavy number of behaviors had the CIA
label on them.
If your campfire must reside in a cast iron pot then it is pointless to
use the magnesium to start it there until the water has been removed or at least
pointed out to the Chef.
You persistent vehemence against the BPWH seems to suggest that you take
these DS section proceedings to be something more than INCONSEQUENTIAL. I can
only commend you for that smidgen of (political/spiritual) insight. But are you
suggesting the CK is BHO’s Rasputin???
That is a more serious allegation, but one that is permissible to discuss
here, remaining within the bounds of only one brick-thrower at a time….!! And,
please, allow me to note, that within the space of one or two posts, you are
vacillating between the under-consequential view of R&D to the
A very significant part of my mission is to find the fine line between
over-reaction and under-reaction.
just because you have a get out of jail
free card coming doesn't mean you get to continue business as usual
Cy, feel free to elaborate on this last observation……..
Exactly what ‘business’ do you not wish me to continue? The disclosure
business or the eschaton business?
Yes, CK is very clever in insulating himself behind the Eschaton. In order
to get to CK, you will have to acknowledge the Eschaton contingency of
And how many politicians or pundits are willing to do that?? PRECIOUS
FEW!!! Yes, CK is playing fast and loose with the US Constitution. BUT, the only
way to get to CK is by going though Chicken Little who has been his publicist
for these many years. The only way to enlist CL in nailing CK is by taking
seriously the Eschaton contingency. It is that simple! (cont.)
Ok, now to address your comments.
I am not at all persistently vehement against your BPWH. While I do disagree with it in many regards I do treat it with respect as one of many interpretations to this Paradigm as an option to how humanity might choose to interpret and react in regards to the Contact Paradigm and Human Potential. I have made it quite clear in the past that I did not agree with readiness for an existential leap on the scale of the one you propose. Or that an eschaton type sitation will net the results you expect. Life tramas leave horrible marks and baggage upon the human spirit, an eschaton type event is very destructive/damaging to spiritual evolution for this reason. But I don't exclude this interpretation from the cadre of ones existing because that would be interfereing with honorable free will.
I do however take/have tremendous vehemence in opposition with a continuance of unethical, immoral, and illegal behavior regarding this paradigm. It is unnecessary and your manipulations of humanity in those manners paint you, your brethren, and many less informed participants and collateral parties as horrendously evil whether deserved or not! It begs the question of how many times will a human mash their fingers with the same hammer before they choose some other method of driving a nail?
Your stacking of the conversational/observational deck is what initiated this response from me today for it illustrates in prime example an inherent dishonorability this and previous behaviors originating from this faction.
As any interepretation you have a right to present and to be heard, to be acknowledged, to engage in debate, and to defend, etc....you do not however have a right to exceed the bounds of common decency in the process of doing or achieving such ends. Nor does anyone in this in either the forefront or behind the scenes. The days of that being the status quo and/or acceptability are at an end.
« Last Edit: Today at 11:28am by Cyrellys »