Re: New (temporary) Rule - DS section
« Reply #22 Today at 9:05am »
Today at 8:53am, dan wrote:
Hense your ethical problem is apparent.
A one sided stacked conversation is no conversation or debate at all....it is
only Dictatorial....a shadow of Tyranny.If your perspective holds Truth then
Truth shall stand in Strength with no need for Dictatorial Conditions. This an
argument against your presentation....the presenter or the manner of
presentation is falleable.
YOU are NOT SYNCHRONICITY. Nor am I a GRANDMOTHER....therefore your
Dictatorial Conditions can only illustrate the Universal Creative Source
Synchronistic hand of admonition when you use POWER in a negative fashion. An
admonition for all to consider.
You are distasteful in thanking me for an Compliance you seek, which I
have not given.
As you can readily ascertain, I am deeply engaged here in dialogue mode
I am as practiced in this mode as much as anyone in the world. And you are
rudely interrupting. Why can’t you just mind your own INCONSEQUENTIAL
Because, my dear Dan, you and CKs intent to be the singular moving force in briefing our initially highly controlled and improperly influenced President Obama and intent to be the singular interpretation of Contact, the History of Contact, and the Primary Course of Human Potential Presented is warped, and humanly unconstructive, potentially destructive, and generally annoying in its distinct lack of Ethical Behavior ACROSS THE BOARD.
I've sat back and observed for a good year, now I speak to be heard on the matter.